Emotional Regulation Under Stress

Emotional Regulation Under Stress: What the Research Suggests We Can Actually Practice

Most of us know what emotional regulation feels like when it fails. Something happens, stress rises, attention narrows, the body becomes activated, thoughts accelerate, and anger, fear, shame, or frustration suddenly feels enormously important. Behavior that would have seemed obviously unhelpful twenty minutes earlier can start to feel completely reasonable. Then, after the nervous system settles down, we wonder why we said that, sent that message, ate that thing, avoided that conversation, or spent the next three hours replaying an event we could no longer change.

Emotion regulation is often described as the ability to “control your emotions,” but that framing is probably too crude. Emotions are not switches, and successful regulation does not necessarily mean making an emotion disappear. Across several areas represented in the research literature, a more useful picture emerges. Emotional regulation is the ability to notice and respond to emotional activation in ways that remain flexible, context-sensitive, and reasonably consistent with our longer-term goals. That distinction matters because stress changes the conditions under which we have to regulate ourselves. When we are calm, it is relatively easy to imagine responding thoughtfully. The interesting question is what happens when fear, anger, uncertainty, fatigue, interpersonal conflict, or some other stressor is already competing for our attention.

The research suggests that successful regulation in those moments depends on more than a single technique. It involves attention, physiological arousal, cognitive flexibility, our relationship with difficult internal experiences, learned behavioral skills, recovery, and even the social environments we live in. In other words, emotional regulation is less like an emergency button and more like a system.

Stress does not simply produce an unpleasant feeling. It changes how we process information. One useful line of evidence comes from research on executive functioning and resilience. A systematic review examining “hot” and “cold” executive functions found that cognitive flexibility showed the most consistent positive relationship with resilience, with additional supportive evidence for working memory (Mecha et al., 2024). Hot executive functions refer especially to decision-making when emotions, rewards, or consequences are personally salient. That distinction matters because the skills we demonstrate in a quiet room are not necessarily the skills available when we are angry, frightened, rejected, exhausted, or overwhelmed.

A study of 594 young adults illustrates this well. Greater perceived stress and poorer affective decision-making were associated with more problematic approach-and-avoidance eating patterns, and stress-related vulnerability was concentrated particularly among people with poorer hot executive functioning (Chen et al., 2024). Because the study was observational, it cannot prove that stress caused the eating behavior, but it fits a broader pattern: regulation gets harder when emotionally loaded decision-making systems are under strain. This is one reason advice like “just make the rational choice” is so unhelpful in the moment. The problem is often not that we have never heard the rational choice. The problem is that the systems required to implement it are competing with a much louder signal.

A useful first principle follows: the goal of regulation under stress is often not to solve the entire problem immediately. It is to create enough psychological and physiological space to make a better next decision. When arousal becomes sufficiently high, even simple interventions may help because they ask relatively little of cognition.

Breathing is a good example. In a large single-session experiment involving 828 adults, slower diaphragmatic breathing between roughly 6 and 12 breaths per minute was associated with lower immediate anxiety following the intervention. The specific ratio between inhalation and exhalation did not independently predict the anxiety outcome (Czub et al., 2024). That does not mean there is one magical breathing cadence. It suggests something considerably less glamorous and more useful: deliberately slowing respiration may help reduce acute anxiety. This matters because people sometimes approach emotional regulation backward. They try to reason themselves out of an emotional state while their body is still behaving as though something urgent is happening. If physiological activation is very high, a more effective first move may simply be to lower the intensity enough that reasoning becomes available again.

Guided imagery offers another possible short-term tool, although the evidence is less consistent. A randomized study of healthy adults found that brief guided imagery was associated with lower stress indicators, increased EEG alpha activity, and improvements on selected measures of attentional control (Zemla et al., 2023). Yet another randomized trial involving women preparing for IVF found reductions in stress over time but no statistically significant advantage of guided imagery over routine care (Damghanian et al., 2025). The broader guided-imagery literature is large but extremely heterogeneous, which makes broad efficacy claims difficult (Giacobbi et al., 2017). So guided imagery may help some people, but the evidence does not justify pretending that imagining a beach solves the human condition. The broader lesson is that acute regulation sometimes begins with the body. Slow breathing, reducing stimulation, pausing, walking, or briefly changing environments can create conditions for more deliberate regulation.

Stress also captures attention. We start scanning for threat, replaying the same thought, mentally rehearsing an argument, or searching for evidence confirming what we fear. The stressor can consume more and more of the attentional field, which makes attentional flexibility an important regulatory capacity. A randomized controlled trial of an automated Attention Training Technique found that both abbreviated and longer versions reduced stress compared with a waitlist. Interestingly, the five-minute version showed better adherence and a larger stress effect, even though the hypothesized changes in attentional-control measures were not clearly demonstrated (Baumeister et al., 2024). That caveat matters. The intervention appeared helpful, but the proposed mechanism was not neatly confirmed.

Mindfulness research provides additional evidence that attention can be trained. A meta-analysis of 111 randomized controlled trials involving 9,538 participants found small-to-moderate improvements in selected cognitive domains, including aspects of executive attention, working memory, inhibition, and sustained attention (Zainal & Newman, 2024). A separate systematic review and meta-analysis found a small overall benefit of mindfulness-based programs for cognition, particularly executive function and working memory, although benefits were more convincing against inactive than active comparators (Whitfield et al., 2022). This does not mean that mindfulness makes people permanently calm. One randomized trial involving adolescents, for example, found no significant improvement in measured symptoms or emotion-regulation strategies after an eight-week mindfulness intervention (Piguet et al., 2025). A secondary analysis of the same trial later found changes in patterns of strategy use, including increased relaxation but also reduced acceptance and problem solving, leaving the clinical meaning uncertain (Mendola et al., 2026).

That kind of null and ambiguous evidence is useful because it prevents mindfulness from becoming a secular miracle cure. A more defensible conclusion is that mindfulness can train aspects of attention and cognitive control and can modestly reduce stress on average, but its effects vary by population, intervention, outcome, and comparator. A meta-analysis of meditation programs against active comparison conditions found small average benefits for perceived stress (around g = 0.18) and well-being (around g = 0.25) (Seekircher et al., 2023). Those are useful effects, but they are not transformative ones. From an emotion-regulation perspective, mindfulness may therefore offer a deceptively simple skill: notice where attention has gone, and practice bringing it somewhere more useful. Not because the emotion is illegitimate, but because feeding an emotional loop with continuous attention can keep the nervous system activated long after the original event has ended.

This distinction becomes especially important with rumination. When distressed, it can feel as though repeatedly thinking about a problem must eventually produce a solution. Sometimes reflection does help, but repetitive thought can also become a self-sustaining loop that keeps distress alive without producing meaningful new information. Research repeatedly links rumination and experiential avoidance with poorer outcomes across domains. In bereaved adults, guilt was associated with prolonged grief symptoms, while experiential avoidance and several forms of rumination statistically accounted for part of that association. Because the study was cross-sectional, it cannot establish that avoidance or rumination caused prolonged grief (Alves & Neto, 2026). A systematic review in eating-disorder research similarly found consistent associations between experiential avoidance, rumination, and greater eating pathology, while emphasizing that much of the evidence was cross-sectional (Gulacan et al., 2025).

Intervention research offers somewhat stronger evidence that repetitive thought can be changed. A systematic review and meta-analysis found that mindfulness- and acceptance-based interventions reduced depressive rumination compared with usual care, with a moderate effect, but they did not outperform active psychological treatments (Perestelo-Perez et al., 2017). This suggests a practical question during stress: am I still solving the problem, or am I now repeating the problem? Useful reflection generates something new, such as information, perspective, a decision, an action, or acceptance of what cannot currently be changed. Rumination produces another lap around the same track.

One of the largest evidence bases relevant to emotional regulation comes from cognitive behavioral therapy. A review of 269 meta-analyses found broad support for CBT across a wide range of psychological problems, with especially strong evidence in areas including anxiety, anger, stress-related problems, and several specific disorders (Hofmann et al., 2012). A much larger meta-review covering 494 systematic reviews and more than 221,000 participants found a modest general benefit for health-related quality of life across conditions, while also noting substantial variation in review quality and population representation (Fordham et al., 2021). More focused evidence is stronger. A meta-analysis of placebo-controlled trials found that CBT produced a moderate improvement in anxiety-related target symptoms (g = 0.56) and nearly tripled the odds of treatment response relative to placebo conditions (Carpenter et al., 2018). A 2025 meta-analysis covering roughly 30 years of anxiety trials found a similar overall advantage (g = 0.51), with no evidence that CBT effect sizes had meaningfully declined over time (Hofmann et al., 2025).

CBT is much larger than “think positively.” One of its most useful lessons for everyday regulation is simply that our interpretation of an event contributes to our emotional response. Something happens, and then we make meaning from it. “They ignored my message because they do not respect me.” “I screwed this up, so I am incompetent.” “This feeling means something terrible is about to happen.” “If I do not fix this immediately, everything will get worse.” Under stress, those interpretations can arrive so quickly that they feel indistinguishable from the facts themselves.

A CBT-style regulatory practice does not require us to tell ourselves that everything is wonderful. It asks us to inspect the interpretation. What actually happened? What evidence supports my interpretation? What evidence does not? Am I predicting something I cannot know? Am I interpreting another person's motives? Am I treating one mistake as evidence about my entire identity? Is there a less catastrophic interpretation that still fits the available facts? This is not positive thinking. It is more accurate thinking, and accuracy becomes especially valuable when stress has narrowed the field.

Acceptance and Commitment Therapy offers a different but complementary insight. Sometimes the attempt to get rid of a feeling becomes part of the problem. ACT focuses on psychological flexibility: the ability to stay in contact with thoughts, feelings, and circumstances while choosing behavior based on values and context rather than avoidance or rigid internal rules. The empirical support for ACT is substantial but should not be exaggerated. Meta-analyses generally find that ACT performs better than inactive or usual-care conditions, while it does not consistently outperform established treatments such as CBT (A-Tjak et al., 2015; Gloster et al., 2020; Öst, 2014). That pattern is useful because it suggests ACT is a legitimate evidence-based approach without requiring a therapeutic cage match over which acronym has conquered psychology.

Research also suggests that psychological flexibility itself is modifiable. A three-level meta-analysis of 20 studies involving 1,750 university students found that ACT interventions produced a small-to-moderate improvement in psychological flexibility and inflexibility (g = .38) (Hsu et al., 2023). For emotion regulation under stress, ACT contributes a crucial distinction: the goal is not necessarily to feel better before acting better. We can feel anxious and still speak carefully. We can feel angry and decide not to send the message. We can feel ashamed and still take responsibility. We can feel overwhelmed and still take one useful step. We can experience uncertainty without forcing ourselves into a premature conclusion. This approach shifts regulation from “How do I eliminate this feeling?” to “How do I carry this feeling without allowing it to choose my behavior for me?” That is often a much more achievable objective.

Dialectical Behavior Therapy is especially relevant because it explicitly trains emotion regulation, distress tolerance, mindfulness, and behavioral skills. A systematic review and meta-analysis covering 34 studies and 2,536 participants found that DBT significantly reduced anger, with a small pooled effect. Effects on aggressive behavior were less certain and did not reach statistical significance overall (Ciesinski et al., 2022). A broader review of anger and aggression treatments also found that psychosocial interventions, particularly CBT-oriented approaches, generally produced at least moderate improvements in anger, although effects on actual aggression were less consistent (Lee & DiGiuseppe, 2018).

A randomized trial of a self-guided DBT skills app for recurrent binge eating provides another useful demonstration of skill training. Among 576 adults, the app reduced objective binge-eating episodes and eating-disorder psychopathology compared with a waitlist. But nearly half of the intervention group dropped out, and engagement declined over time (Linardon et al., 2024). That attrition problem deserves attention. Effective skills are not useful if nobody practices them. One reason DBT-style strategies can be helpful during acute stress is that they are designed to be concrete. When arousal is high, elaborate philosophical analysis may not be available. A rehearsed pause, breathing routine, grounding exercise, behavioral delay, or plan for leaving a conflict temporarily may be much easier to implement. This suggests another principle: do not design your emergency regulation strategy while you are already in the emergency. Skills become more available under stress when they have been practiced beforehand.

It is also tempting to treat emotion regulation as an entirely internal psychological process, but the research suggests that behavior matters too. Exercise provides a simple example. A 2026 systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials found that acute aerobic exercise increased positive mood and reduced negative mood in healthy adults. Longer-term aerobic exercise also reduced negative mood, although pooled effects on cognition and sleep were not statistically significant (Wang et al., 2026). This does not make exercise an emergency treatment for every emotional crisis, but it supports something people often discover empirically: sometimes changing bodily state through movement is more useful than sitting still and arguing with one's thoughts.

The broader implication is that regulation can involve changing what we are doing. Walking, eating if we have not eaten, leaving the screen, reducing stimulation, moving the body, changing environments, calling someone, or taking the next concrete action on the problem can all alter the regulatory context. Our mental state is not sealed inside the skull.

One less glamorous conclusion from the literature is that regulation also depends on underlying cognitive resources, and sleep helps maintain those resources. A 2024 meta-analysis of experimental sleep-restriction studies found that even partial sleep restriction produced a small but reliable impairment in memory formation (g = .29) (Crowley et al., 2024). Sleep is not simply downtime. Losing it changes cognitive performance. The literature also contains strong evidence that sleep problems themselves are treatable. A meta-analysis of 20 randomized trials found that CBT for insomnia reduced sleep-onset latency by roughly 19 minutes, reduced wakefulness after sleep onset by approximately 26 minutes, and increased sleep efficiency by about ten percentage points, with evidence that improvements persisted (Trauer et al., 2015). Internet-delivered CBT-I also produced meaningful improvements across several sleep outcomes that generally persisted for up to 48 weeks (Zachariae et al., 2016).

These studies are about sleep rather than emotion regulation directly, so we should not claim more than they show. But if regulation depends partly on attention, working memory, cognitive flexibility, inhibition, and decision-making, chronically undermining those systems through inadequate recovery is unlikely to make emotional regulation easier. Sometimes the sophisticated psychological intervention is going to bed. An insultingly biological answer, but bodies continue refusing to become optional.

Emotion regulation is also shaped by purpose and values. It is not merely a process of suppressing distress. It involves knowing what behavior is worth choosing while distress is present. Research on purpose is relevant here. An individual-participant meta-analysis of 16 samples involving more than 108,000 people found that greater purpose in life was consistently associated with lower perceived stress, with a meta-analytic association around -.23 (Sutin et al., 2024). Because these were observational data, they cannot establish whether purpose reduces stress, lower-stress individuals develop greater purpose, or both processes occur. A longitudinal study provides somewhat stronger temporal evidence. Among 2,821 adolescents followed into adulthood, greater purpose in late adolescence predicted lower risk of later depression over approximately ten years, even after adjustment for psychiatric history and sensitivity analyses excluding early cases (Sutin et al., 2026).

Purpose is not an acute relaxation technique. Its contribution may instead be organizational. When we know what matters, emotion does not have to disappear before we know what to do. This fits closely with ACT. Values can function as a behavioral compass during emotional storms. Instead of asking, “What action will make this feeling disappear fastest?” we can ask, “What action is consistent with the person I want to be?” Those two answers are often very different.

Self-compassion may also matter because emotional activation is often followed by a second emotional process: judging ourselves for having the first emotion. We become anxious, then ashamed of being anxious. We become angry, then furious with ourselves for losing control. We fail, then convert a mistake into evidence of personal worthlessness. A randomized meditation study involving 217 adults found that participants lower in baseline self-compassion tended to show greater affective and mental-health benefits from meditation interventions, and increases in self-compassion statistically mediated reductions in depressive symptoms, particularly among people who started low in self-compassion (Kury et al., 2026). Cross-sectional research in adolescents also finds relationships among self-compassion, emotional intelligence, shame, and depressive symptoms, although the design cannot establish causal pathways (Castilho et al., 2017).

The practical point is not that we should excuse everything we do while stressed. Self-compassion and accountability are perfectly compatible. A useful stance might be: “This is difficult. My nervous system is activated. I am still responsible for what I do next.” That is very different from either self-condemnation or self-excuse.

One of the strongest lessons from the broader literature is that emotion regulation should not be treated solely as an individual project. Human beings regulate one another. Supportive relationships can provide reassurance, alternative perspectives, practical help, belonging, and a buffer against stress. A systematic review of adult friendship research found that friendship quality, social support, and socializing were consistently associated with greater well-being (Pezirkianidis et al., 2023). During highly stressful collective events, social context appears particularly important. A systematic review of 52 studies involving more than 57,000 people exposed to protests, riots, and revolutions found worse mental-health outcomes clustered around greater violence and conflict, weaker social support, and lower resilience, although causal interpretation is difficult given the heterogeneity of the observational evidence (Ni et al., 2020).

The broader health literature is even more striking. A meta-analysis of 148 prospective studies involving more than 308,000 people found that stronger social relationships were associated with roughly a 50% greater likelihood of survival over follow-up, with measures of social integration showing especially strong associations (Holt-Lunstad et al., 2010). That finding is not an emotion-regulation experiment, and we should not pretend it is. But it reinforces something the psychological literature often underestimates: a resilient regulatory system includes other people. Sometimes the best regulation strategy is not another internal technique. It is talking to someone who can help us think, asking for support before stress becomes isolation, or simply letting another person help us settle.

Across these different areas, I think the literature supports a practical sequence for moments of stress. The first task is recognition. Notice that regulation capacity has changed. Identify the emotion, bodily activation, repetitive thought, and behavioral urge. The important realization is often simply, “I am activated right now.” Then reduce arousal if necessary. Slow breathing has direct experimental support for reducing immediate anxiety (Czub et al., 2024). Movement also has evidence for short-term mood benefits (Wang et al., 2026). Grounding or guided imagery may help some people, although evidence for guided imagery is more heterogeneous (Giacobbi et al., 2017; Zemla et al., 2023).

Next, interrupt attentional capture. If the mind is looping, ask whether continued thinking produces new information or merely reproduces distress. Shift attention deliberately, use mindfulness skills, engage the environment, or return attention to a concrete task. Once enough cognitive space returns, examine the interpretation. What happened versus what am I telling myself happened? What am I predicting? What motives am I assigning to other people? What information am I missing?

Then make room for what cannot be changed immediately. Anxiety does not have to disappear. Anger does not have to disappear. Sadness does not have to disappear. Acceptance in the ACT sense means allowing internal experience to be present without making its removal a prerequisite for meaningful behavior. Finally, orient toward values. Ask what action you will still respect after the nervous system settles down. Sometimes the answer is speaking. Sometimes apologizing. Sometimes setting a boundary. Sometimes leaving temporarily. Sometimes doing nothing until tomorrow. The goal is not always calm. The goal is behavior you can stand behind later.

The deeper lesson from the literature is that effective in-the-moment regulation is partly built outside the moment. Regular mindfulness or attentional practice may strengthen components of executive attention and inhibition (Whitfield et al., 2022; Zainal & Newman, 2024). ACT-based practice can strengthen psychological flexibility, helping people act in the presence of difficult internal experiences rather than only after those experiences have disappeared (Hsu et al., 2023). CBT can train people to identify and evaluate interpretations that amplify distress (Carpenter et al., 2018; Hofmann et al., 2012). DBT provides concrete distress-tolerance and emotion-regulation skills that you can rehearse before crises occur (Ciesinski et al., 2022).

Exercise may improve mood and reduce negative affect (Wang et al., 2026). Addressing chronic insomnia through CBT-I can improve sleep reliably (Trauer et al., 2015; Zachariae et al., 2016). Purpose and values may provide behavioral direction during uncertainty (Sutin et al., 2024, 2026). Relationships provide forms of support that no amount of solitary self-regulation can fully replace (Holt-Lunstad et al., 2010; Pezirkianidis et al., 2023). These approaches are not competitors. They target different parts of the system. Breathing works on acute activation. Attention training works on attentional capture. Mindfulness trains awareness and aspects of cognitive control. CBT examines interpretation. ACT changes our relationship with internal experience and reconnects behavior to values. DBT develops practical regulation and distress-tolerance skills. Exercise changes bodily and affective state. Sleep protects cognitive resources. Purpose organizes behavior. Relationships help us regulate socially. That is probably a more realistic model of emotional regulation than searching for the one perfect technique.

The strongest conclusion I take from the literature is that emotional regulation should not be defined as successfully reducing emotion. Sometimes reducing emotional intensity is useful. Sometimes changing our interpretation is useful. Sometimes solving the external problem is useful. Sometimes accepting the feeling is useful. Sometimes moving is useful. Sometimes talking to another person is useful. Sometimes getting away from the situation is useful. Sometimes approaching what we have been avoiding is precisely what needs to happen.

No universally adaptive emotional-regulation strategy exists independent of context. The deeper capacity is flexibility: noticing what is happening, having several possible responses available, and selecting one that fits the situation and our longer-term goals. That is also where this topic begins to overlap with wisdom. Contemporary wisdom models repeatedly include emotional regulation, perspective taking, uncertainty tolerance, metacognition, and context-sensitive judgment among the capacities involved in wise behavior (Bangen et al., 2013; Glück & Weststrate, 2022; Grossmann et al., 2020). Regulation matters not because emotions are enemies of reason, but because overwhelming activation can make it harder to see the situation clearly enough to choose well.

We do not need to become people who never get angry, anxious, frightened, sad, or overwhelmed. That is neither realistic nor particularly desirable. We want to become people who notice those states sooner, understand what they do to our attention and judgment, and create enough room between feeling and action that we still have choices. The emotion gets a seat at the table. It does not automatically get the chairperson's vote.

References

A-Tjak, J. G. L., Davis, M. L., Morina, N., Powers, M. B., Smits, J. A. J., & Emmelkamp, P. M. G. (2015). A meta-analysis of the efficacy of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for clinically relevant mental and physical health problems. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 84, 30–36. https://doi.org/10.1159/000365764

Alves, M. I., & Neto, D. D. (2026). Guilt in bereavement: The role of experiential avoidance and rumination. Death Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2026.2704579

Bangen, K. J., Meeks, T. W., & Jeste, D. V. (2013). Defining and assessing wisdom: A review of the literature. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 21(12), 1254–1266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jagp.2012.11.020

Baumeister, A., Böger, S., Schindler, L., Klein, J. P., & Moritz, S. (2024). Effectiveness of an abbreviated version of the automated attention training technique (ATT) for stress reduction in a non-clinical sample: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 32, 100772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2024.100772

Carpenter, J. K., Andrews, L. A., Witcraft, S. M., Powers, M. B., Smits, J. A. J., & Hofmann, S. G. (2018). Cognitive behavioral therapy for anxiety and related disorders: A meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials. Depression and Anxiety, 35(6), 502–514. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.22728

Castilho, P., Carvalho, S. A., Marques, S., & Pinto-Gouveia, J. (2017). Self-compassion and emotional intelligence in adolescence: A multigroup mediational study of the impact of shame memories on depressive symptoms. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 26, 759–768. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-016-0613-4

Chen, M., Lam, W. W. T., Yuan, J., Dong, M., Yang, L., Chan, D. K. C., & Liao, Q. (2024). Executive function, perceived stress and eating behaviours among Chinese young adults. Stress and Health, 40, e3397. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.3397

Ciesinski, N. K., Sorgi-Wilson, K. M., Cheung, J. C., Chen, E. Y., & McCloskey, M. S. (2022). The effect of dialectical behavior therapy on anger and aggressive behavior: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 154, 104122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2022.104122

Crowley, R., Alderman, E., Javadi, A.-H., & Tamminen, J. (2024). A systematic and meta-analytic review of the impact of sleep restriction on memory formation. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 167, 105929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105929

Czub, M., Kowal, M., Esteve Zarazaga, R., Serrano-Ibáñez, E. R., Ruíz-Párraga, G. T., Ramírez-Maestre, C., López-Martínez, A. E., Paccione, C., & Piskorz, J. (2024). A slow diaphragmatic breathing intervention for anxiety: How do respiration rate and inhalation/exhalation ratio influence self-reported anxiety? Stress and Health, 40, e3496. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.3496

Damghanian, M., Noorzaie, S., Rahimi, S., Moini, A., & Haghani, S. (2025). Effect of guided imagery relaxation on stress in infertile women candidates for in vitro fertilization. BMC Psychology, 13, 871. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-03235-5

Fordham, B., Sugavanam, T., Edwards, K., Stallard, P., Howard, R., das Nair, R., Copsey, B., Lee, H., Howick, J., Hemming, K., & Lamb, S. E. (2021). The evidence for cognitive behavioural therapy in any condition, population or context: A meta-review of systematic reviews and panoramic meta-analysis. Psychological Medicine, 51, 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291720005292

Giacobbi, P. R., Jr., Stewart, J., Chaffee, K., Jaeschke, A.-M., Stabler, M., & Kelley, G. A. (2017). A scoping review of health outcomes examined in randomized controlled trials using guided imagery. Progress in Preventive Medicine, 2, e0010. https://doi.org/10.1097/PP9.0000000000000010

Gloster, A. T., Walder, N., Levin, M. E., Twohig, M. P., & Karekla, M. (2020). The empirical status of acceptance and commitment therapy: A review of meta-analyses. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 18, 181–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2020.09.009

Glück, J., & Weststrate, N. M. (2022). The wisdom researchers and the elephant: An integrative model of wise behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 26(4), 342–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/10888683221094650

Grossmann, I., Weststrate, N. M., Ardelt, M., Brienza, J. P., Dong, M., Ferrari, M., Fournier, M. A., Hu, C. S., Nusbaum, H. C., & Vervaeke, J. (2020). The science of wisdom in a polarized world: Knowns and unknowns. Psychological Inquiry, 31(2), 103–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2020.1750917

Gulacan, D., Gunay-Oge, R., & Inozu, M. (2025). The role of experiential avoidance and related factors in eating disorders: A systematic review. Current Psychology, 44, 7312–7325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-025-07425-7

Hofmann, S. G., Asnaani, A., Vonk, I. J. J., Sawyer, A. T., & Fang, A. (2012). The efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy: A review of meta-analyses. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 36, 427–440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-012-9476-1

Hofmann, S. G., Kasch, C., & Reis, A. (2025). Effect sizes of randomized-controlled studies of cognitive behavioral therapy for anxiety disorders over the past 30 years. Clinical Psychology Review, 117, 102553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2025.102553

Holt-Lunstad, J., Smith, T. B., & Layton, J. B. (2010). Social relationships and mortality risk: A meta-analytic review. PLoS Medicine, 7(7), e1000316. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000316

Hsu, T., Adamowicz, J. L., & Thomas, E. B. K. (2023). The effect of acceptance and commitment therapy on the psychological flexibility and inflexibility of undergraduate students: A systematic review and three-level meta-analysis. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 30, 169–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2023.10.006

Kury, M. B., Fredrickson, B. L., Van Cappellen, P., & Don, B. P. (2026). Understanding the affective and mental health outcomes of meditation interventions: The role of individual differences in self-compassion. Mindfulness, 17, 1497–1513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-026-02803-z

Lee, A. H., & DiGiuseppe, R. (2018). Anger and aggression treatments: A review of meta-analyses. Current Opinion in Psychology, 19, 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.04.004

Linardon, J., Anderson, C., McClure, Z., Liu, C., Messer, M., Jarman, H. K., & Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, M. (2024). A dialectical behavior therapy skills training smartphone app for recurrent binge eating: A randomized clinical trial. Psychological Medicine, 54, 4646–4657. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291724002800

Mecha, P., Rodriguez-Morales, M., & Sanchez-Lopez, A. (2024). Components of hot and cold executive functions and their relations to different forms of stress resilience: A systematic review. Stress and Health, 40, e3439. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.3439

Mendola, E., Meuleman, B., Magnus Smith, M., Ivanova, V., Pham, E., Savary, V., Cernadas, P., Celen, Z., Saccaro, L. F., Samson, A., Klauser, P., Merglen, A., & Piguet, C. M. (2026). Mindfulness shapes emotion regulation in non-clinical adolescents: Secondary outcomes of a randomized controlled trial. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 31(1), 195–211. https://doi.org/10.1177/13591045251377898

Ni, M. Y., Kim, Y., McDowell, I., Wong, S., Qiu, H., Wong, I. O. L., Galea, S., & Leung, G. M. (2020). Mental health during and after protests, riots and revolutions: A systematic review. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 54(3), 232–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004867419899165

Öst, L.-G. (2014). The efficacy of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Behaviour Research and Therapy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2014.07.018

Perestelo-Perez, L., Barraca, J., Peñate, W., Rivero-Santana, A., & Álvarez-Pérez, Y. (2017). Mindfulness-based interventions for the treatment of depressive rumination: Systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 17, 282–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2017.07.004

Pezirkianidis, C., Galanaki, E., Raftopoulou, G., Moraitou, D., & Stalikas, A. (2023). Adult friendship and wellbeing: A systematic review with practical implications. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1059057. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1059057

Piguet, C., Celen, Z., Meuleman, B., Schilliger, Z., Magnus Smith, M., Mendola, E., Pham, E., Jouabli, S., Ivanova, V., Murray, R. J., Klauser, P., & Merglen, A. (2025). Impact of a mindfulness-based intervention on symptoms and emotion regulation strategies in young adolescents from the general population: A randomized controlled trial. Depression and Anxiety, 2025, 2679049.

Seekircher, J., Burgard, T., & Bosnjak, M. (2023). The effects of clinical meditation programs on stress and well-being: An updated rapid review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with active comparison groups. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 231(1), 16–29. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000510

Sutin, A. R., Luchetti, M., Stephan, Y., Sesker, A. A., & Terracciano, A. (2024). Purpose in life and stress: An individual-participant meta-analysis of 16 samples. Journal of Affective Disorders, 345, 378–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2023.10.149

Sutin, A. R., Luchetti, M., Stephan, Y., & Terracciano, A. (2026). Purpose in life in late adolescence and incident depression over 10 years. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 192, 321–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2025.10.068

Trauer, J. M., Qian, M. Y., Doyle, J. S., Rajaratnam, S. M. W., & Cunnington, D. (2015). Cognitive behavioral therapy for chronic insomnia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Annals of Internal Medicine, 163(3), 191–204. https://doi.org/10.7326/M14-2841

Wang, S., Chen, J., Gao, C., Zhou, Y., Wei, Z., & Liang, Z. (2026). Effects of aerobic exercise on cognition, sleep, and mood in healthy adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 20, 1808755. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2026.1808755

Whitfield, T., Barnhofer, T., Acabchuk, R., Cohen, A., Lee, M., Schlosser, M., Arenaza-Urquijo, E. M., Böttcher, A., Britton, W., Coll-Padros, N., Collette, F., Chételat, G., Dautricourt, S., Demnitz-King, H., Dumais, T., Klimecki, O., Meiberth, D., Moulinet, I., Müller, T., Parsons, E., Sager, L., Sannemann, L., Scharf, J., Schild, A.-K., Touron, E., Wirth, M., Walker, Z., Moitra, E., Lutz, A., Lazar, S. W., Vago, D., & Marchant, N. L. (2022). The effect of mindfulness-based programs on cognitive function in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuropsychology Review, 32, 677–702. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-021-09519-y

Zachariae, R., Lyby, M. S., Ritterband, L. M., & O'Toole, M. S. (2016). Efficacy of internet-delivered cognitive-behavioral therapy for insomnia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Sleep Medicine Reviews, 30, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smrv.2015.10.004

Zainal, N. H., & Newman, M. G. (2024). Mindfulness enhances cognitive functioning: A meta-analysis of 111 randomized controlled trials. Health Psychology Review, 18(2), 369–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2023.2248222

Zemla, K., Sedek, G., Wróbel, K., Postepski, F., & Wojcik, G. M. (2023). Investigating the impact of guided imagery on stress, brain functions, and attention: A randomized trial. Sensors, 23, 6210. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23136210